On 03/18/2010 05:17 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote: >>> + res = strtod(arg->data, &end_p); >> >> Should we be using the gnulib strtod module here? > > Why? It doesn't seem to be any better than C89 strtod. Or did I miss anything? strtod is broken on a number of platforms in various ways; most of them related to parsing the new formats required by C99, but there are some other bugs even with C89 parsing as well: http://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/gnulib.git/tree/doc/posix-functions/strtod.texi -- Eric Blake eblake@xxxxxxxxxx +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list