On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 01:49:27PM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> On 9/9/21 6:13 PM, Pavel Hrdina wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > src/remote/remote_driver.c | 1 +
> > src/remote/remote_protocol.x | 14 +++++++++++++-
> > src/remote_protocol-structs | 6 ++++++
> > 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
>
> > diff --git a/src/remote/remote_protocol.x b/src/remote/remote_protocol.x
> > index df1b126b0c..0a64504d45 100644
> > --- a/src/remote/remote_protocol.x
> > +++ b/src/remote/remote_protocol.x
> > @@ -3854,6 +3854,12 @@ struct remote_domain_start_dirty_rate_calc_args {
> > unsigned int flags;
> > };
> >
> > +struct remote_domain_set_fibre_channel_appid_args {
> > + remote_nonnull_domain dom;
> > + remote_string appid;
> > + unsigned int flags;
> > +};
> > +
> >
> > /*----- Protocol. -----*/
> >
> > @@ -6818,5 +6824,11 @@ enum remote_procedure {
> > * @acl: network:write
> > * @acl: network:save
> > */
> > - REMOTE_PROC_NETWORK_DEFINE_XML_FLAGS = 432
> > + REMOTE_PROC_NETWORK_DEFINE_XML_FLAGS = 432,
> > +
> > + /**
> > + * @generate: both
> > + * @acl: domain:write
>
> Since this is not talking to QEMU on monitor it can't block really and
> thus it's safe to be marked with @priority: high.
Right, I missed that in the protocol documentation. Will fix.
Thanks,
Pavel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
