Hi Michal,
Thanks for your reply.
> On 7/29/21 4:16 AM, Yi Wang wrote:
> > From: Jia Zhou <zhou.jia2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > When loop in function virNVMeDeviceListCreateReAttachList() there may be
> > reused index @i, this patch fix this by using a new @j.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jia Zhou <zhou.jia2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > src/util/virnvme.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/util/virnvme.c b/src/util/virnvme.c
> > index 49102e3..b54a195 100644
> > --- a/src/util/virnvme.c
> > +++ b/src/util/virnvme.c
> > @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ virNVMeDeviceListCreateReAttachList(virNVMeDeviceListPtr activeList,
> > virNVMeDeviceListPtr toReAttachList)
> > {
> > g_autoptr(virPCIDeviceList) pciDevices = NULL;
> > - size_t i;
> > + size_t i, j;
> >
> > if (!(pciDevices = virPCIDeviceListNew()))
> > return NULL;
> > @@ -412,8 +412,8 @@ virNVMeDeviceListCreateReAttachList(virNVMeDeviceListPtr activeList,
> > /* Check if there is any other NVMe device with the same PCI address as
> > * @d. To simplify this, let's just count how many NVMe devices with
> > * the same PCI address there are on the @activeList. */
> > - for (i = 0; i < activeList->count; i++) {
> > - virNVMeDevicePtr other = activeList->devs[i];
> > + for (j = 0; j < activeList->count; j++) {
> > + virNVMeDevicePtr other = activeList->devs[j];
> >
> > if (!virPCIDeviceAddressEqual(&d->address, &other->address))
> > continue;
> >
>
> Ooops yes. This is a bug. However, I'd prefer that 'j' would be defined
> inside the loop.
>
> Also, I'm having difficulties applying this patch. Partly because it's
> multipart e-mail and even if I extract text/plain part then git am is
> still unhappy. Can you please use git send-email?
Actually I used git send-email to send this patch, and I have forwarded this
to our IT department, but unfortunately that may take a long long time :(
Would you please apply this patch manually first? Many thanks.
> Michal
