On 7/28/21 6:17 PM, Kristina Hanicova wrote: > When we try to migrate vm, we check if it contains only devices > that are able to migrate. If a hostdev device is not able to > migrate we raise an error with <hostdev/>, but it can actually be > <interface/>, so we need to check if hostdev device was created > by us from interface and show the right error message. > > Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942315 > > Signed-off-by: Kristina Hanicova <khanicov@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/qemu/qemu_migration.c | 12 +++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_migration.c b/src/qemu/qemu_migration.c > index 4d651aeb1a..34eee9c8b6 100644 > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_migration.c > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_migration.c > @@ -1272,9 +1272,15 @@ qemuMigrationSrcIsAllowedHostdev(const virDomainDef *def) > } > > /* all other PCI hostdevs can't be migrated */ > - virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_UNSUPPORTED, > - _("cannot migrate a domain with <hostdev mode='subsystem' type='%s'>"), > - virDomainHostdevSubsysTypeToString(hostdev->source.subsys.type)); > + if (hostdev->parentnet) { > + virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_UNSUPPORTED, > + _("cannot migrate a domain with <interface type='%s'>"), > + virDomainNetTypeToString(hostdev->parentnet->type)); Small nit, I wonder whether we should report actual type here. Looking into virDomainNetDefFormat() it looks like for a running VM we do report actual type (unless inactive or migratable XML was requested). Thus I think the error message should follow that logic. Otherwise we might report "cannot migrate a domain with interface type=network" while in fact in 'virsh dumpxml' there is just interface type='hostdev' (the type='network' is in inactive XML). Laine, what's your opinion? Michal
