Re: [PATCH] ci: Also perform `brew upgrade` on MacOS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 02:46:18AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 12:50:33PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 06:21:00AM -0700, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:43:39PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > ci: Also perform `brew upgrade` on MacOS
>
> s/MacOS/macOS/
>
> But see below for why we might have to change the subject even
> further.
>
> > @Andrea: if you have a good explanation you'd like to put in the commit message,
> > I'd me glad to add it (or you can do that as well).  Thanks
>
> I think something like
>
>  The base OS image might include outdated contents, and we don't
>  want to get spurious failures caused by bugs that have already been
>  fixed in the respective packages.
>
>  This is particularly important on macOS, because 'brew install foo'
>  will fail if 'foo' is already installed but outdated: upgrading all
>  packages first ensures we never run into this scenario.
>
> would about sum it up.
>
> > @@ -443,6 +444,7 @@ x64-macos-11-build:
> >      CIRRUS_VM_IMAGE_SELECTOR: image
> >      CIRRUS_VM_IMAGE_NAME: big-sur-base
> >      UPDATE_COMMAND: brew update
> > +    UPGRADE_COMMAND: brew upgrade
>
> I believe you also need to add
>
>  UPGRADE_COMMAND: pkg upgrade -y
>
> to the FreeBSD jobs: I don't think Cirrus CI would appreciate having
> a completely empty string in the list of commands it's supposed to
> run.

It does not cause any issues on libnbd setup where the upgrade is run
only on macOS.

Good that Cirrus CI is handling the situation gracefully! Still it
doesn't feel quite right to perform a full system upgrade on macOS,
as well as part of the Linux container build process, but not on
FreeBSD, does it?


The intricacies of what "brew upgrade" means are beyond me, so I did not compare
it to anything else we do.

Are you suggesting that I add the `pkg upgrade -y` to FreeBSDs as well
here?

Yes.

Because then the commit message would not fit the patch.

How so? AFAICT you just need to tweak the subject - the commit
message I suggested still applies just fine after you add the 'pkg
upgrade' call.


OK, but I'll send it as a v2 just for the sake of sane-checking.

Thanks.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux