Chris Lalancette wrote: ... >>> commit 4d3b7e06bc8e2e76584da369406df0909c63f2d4 >>> Author: Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Date: Tue Mar 9 09:33:48 2010 -0700 >>> >>> build: consistently indent preprocessor directives >>> >>> * global: patch created by running: >>> for f in $(git ls-files '*.[ch]') ; do >>> cppi $f > $f.t && mv $f.t $f >>> done >> >> I'll go ahead and push this if no one speaks up soon. >> Rather than downloading and applying the patch, I ran the command >> and committed as you. > > By "this", you mean patch 1/2, correct? I just want to make sure Yes. The one induced by the for loop command, and whose header I quoted. > we don't make syntax-check dependent on a non-existent > cppi package until we have a fallback plan. (My automated build > testing does "make syntax-check", and I don't want it to fail > every night now because cppi is not packaged) I wouldn't push the enforcement patch until I'm sure it will pass (or skip) for everyone. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list