Re: Add options to device xml to skip reattach of pci passthrough devices.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Daniel,
Thanks for response. I was thinking we can do detach operation in libvirt so that user do not need to worry if device is detached. But I agree what you mentioned makes more sense so I will go with that.
Thanks
Manish Mishra

On 17/06/21, 1:45 AM, "Daniel Henrique Barboza" <danielhb413@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



    On 6/9/21 4:38 PM, Manish Mishra wrote:
    > Hi Everyone,
    > 
    > We want to add extra options to device xml to skip reattach of pci passthrough devices. Following is xml format for pci passthrough devices added to domain as of now.
    > 
    > <hostdev mode='subsystem' type='pci' managed='yes'>
    > 
    >    <source>
    > 
    >        <address domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x1a' function='0x7'/>
    > 
    >    </source>
    > 
    > </hostdev>
    > 
    > When we pass managed=’yes’ flag through xml, libvirt takes responsibility of detaching device on domain(guest VM) start and reattaching on domain shutdown. We observed some issues where guest VM shutdown may take long time, blocked for reattach operation on pci passthrough device. As domain lock is held during this time it also makes libvirt mostly inactive as it blocks even basic operations like (virsh list). Reattaching of device to host can block due to reasons like buggy driver or initialization of device itself can take long time in some cases.

    I am more interested in hearing about the problem with this faulty buggy
    driver holding domain lock during device reattach and compromising 'virsh'
    operations, and see if there's something to do to mitigate that, instead
    of creating a XML workaround for a driver problem.

    > 
    > We want to pass following extra options to resolve this:
    > 
    >  1. *skipReAttach*(optional flag)
    > 
    > In some cases we do not need to reattach device to host as it may be reserved only for guests, with this flag we can skip reattach operation on host.  We do not want to modify managed flag to avoid regression, so thinking of adding new optional flag.
    > 
    >  2. *reAttachDriverName*(optional flag)
    > 
    > Name of driver to which we want to attach instead of default, to avoid reattaching to buggy driver. Currently libvirt asks host to auto selects driver for device.
    > 
    > Yes we can use managed=’no’ but in that case user has to take responsibility of detaching device before starting domain which we do not want. Please let us know your views on this.

    The case you mentioned above, "we do not need to reattach device to host
    as it may be reserved only for guests", is one of the most common uses
    we have for managed='no' AFAIK. The user/sysadm must detach the device
    from the host, but it's only one time. After that the device can remain
    detached from the host, and guests can use it freely as long as you
    don't reboot the host (or reattach the device back). This scenario
    you described fit the managed='no' mechanics fine IMO.

    If you want to automate the detach process, you can use a Libvirt QEMU
    hook (/etc/libvirt/hooks/qemu) to make the device detach when starting
    the domain, in case the device isn't already detached. Note that
    this has the same effect of the "skipReAttach" option you proposed.

    Making a design around faulty drivers isn't ideal. If the driver you're
    using starts to have problems with the detach operation as well, 'skipReAttach'
    will do you no good. You'll have to fall back to 'managed=no' to circumvent
    that.

    Even if we discard the motivation, I'm not sure about the utility of having
    more forms of PCI assignment management (e.g managed=yes|no|detach|reattach).
    managed=yes|no seems to cover most use cases where the device driver works
    properly.


    Laine, what do you think?




    Thanks,


    Daniel


    > 
    > Thanks
    > 
    > Manish Mishra
    > 





[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux