On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 03:57:19PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
This test was generated on a guest with the following NUMA
configuration:
<numa>
<cell id='0' cpus='0-23' memory='4194304' unit='KiB' discard='yes'>
<cache level='1' associativity='direct' policy='writeback'>
<size value='10' unit='KiB'/>
<line value='8' unit='B'/>
</cache>
<cache level='2' associativity='full' policy='writethrough'>
<size value='128' unit='KiB'/>
<line value='16' unit='B'/>
</cache>
</cell>
<cell id='1' memory='2097152' unit='KiB'>
<cache level='1' associativity='direct' policy='writeback'>
<size value='10' unit='KiB'/>
<line value='8' unit='B'/>
</cache>
</cell>
<interconnects>
<latency initiator='0' target='0' type='access' value='5'/>
<latency initiator='0' target='0' type='read' value='6'/>
<latency initiator='0' target='0' type='write' value='7'/>
<latency initiator='0' target='1' type='access' value='10'/>
<latency initiator='0' target='1' type='read' value='11'/>
<latency initiator='0' target='1' type='write' value='12'/>
<bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' type='access' value='204800' unit='KiB'/>
<bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' type='read' value='205824' unit='KiB'/>
<bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' type='write' value='206848' unit='KiB'/>
<bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' cache='1' type='access' value='208896' unit='KiB'/>
<bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' cache='1' type='read' value='209920' unit='KiB'/>
<bandwidth initiator='0' target='0' cache='1' type='write' value='210944' unit='KiB'/>
<bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' type='access' value='102400' unit='KiB'/>
<bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' type='read' value='103424' unit='KiB'/>
<bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' type='write' value='104448' unit='KiB'/>
<bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' cache='1' type='access' value='105472' unit='KiB'/>
<bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' cache='1' type='read' value='106496' unit='KiB'/>
<bandwidth initiator='0' target='1' cache='1' type='write' value='107520' unit='KiB'/>
</interconnects>
</numa>
The sysfs content was also copied over from the VM but only those
files which are accessed in the test are stored in the repo.
Just out of curiosity, did you use your access check for that?
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx> [...]
diff --git a/build-aux/syntax-check.mk b/build-aux/syntax-check.mk index 552d639119..be55f26e19 100644 --- a/build-aux/syntax-check.mk +++ b/build-aux/syntax-check.mk @@ -1835,7 +1835,7 @@ exclude_file_name_regexp--sc_prohibit_mixed_case_abbreviations = \ ^src/(vbox/vbox_CAPI.*.h|esx/esx_vi.(c|h)|esx/esx_storage_backend_iscsi.c)$$ exclude_file_name_regexp--sc_prohibit_empty_first_line = \ - ^(src/esx/README|tests/(vmwarever|virhostcpu)data/.*)$$ + ^(src/esx/README|tests/(vmwarever|virhostcpu|vircaps2xml)data/.*)$$
This one bothered me a little bit, but not because of this patch. I'll send a patch to make it hopefully nicer =)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
