On Tue, 2021-03-16 at 18:33 +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> +++ b/ci/helper
> + def _list_stale_images(self):
So far we have not used "_" as the prefix for any method name. Do we
want to start doing that? What would be the criteria?
> + # check for stale images in GitLab registry
> + stale = set(registry_distros) - set(lcitool_hosts)
> + if stale:
> + stale_images = {}
> + for item in stale:
> + for img in images:
> + if item in img["name"]:
This should be
if img["name"].startswith(item)
> def action_refresh(self):
> + # refresh Dockerfiles and vars files
> self.refresh_containers()
> self.refresh_cirrus()
>
> + # check for stale images
> + if self.args.check_stale == "yes" and not self.args.quiet:
Can you please move the logic below into a separate function, similar
to the refresh_containers() and refresh_cirrus() functions? To keep
the entry point smaller.
> + stale_images = self._list_stale_images()
> + if stale_images:
> + spacing = "\n" + 4 * " "
I'm not convinced
"\n" + 4 * " "
is much better than
"\n "
so I'd probably go with the latter.
> + stale_fmt = [f"{k}: {v}" for k, v in stale_images.items()]
f"{k} ({v})" would work better here.
> + print(f"""
> +The following images are stale and can be purged from the registry:
> +{spacing + spacing.join(stale_fmt)}
> +
> +You can remove the above images over the API with the following code snippet:
> +
> + $ for image_id in {' '.join([str(id) for id in stale_images.values()])}; do
> + curl --request DELETE --header "PRIVATE-TOKEN: <access_token>" \\
> + {util.get_registry_uri(namespace, gitlab_uri)}/$image_id
> + done""")
I'm not a fan of the code snippets embedded inside the f-string...
I'd rather do something like
stale_details = spacing.join(stale_fmt)
stale_ids = ' '.join([str(id) for id in stale_images.values()])
registry_uri = util.get_registry_uri(namespace, gitlab_uri)
and then perform trivial variable substitution in the f-string.
Looking at registry_uri specifically, I think it would make sense to
rework list_stale_images() so that you pass the URI in, same as is
already the case for get_registry_images(), to avoid having to
produce it twice... And at that point, you might as well move the
function to util.py and change its signature to
get_registry_stale_images(uri, current_images)
Another thing I'm not a fan of is having the message start at column
zero instead of being aligned along with the rest of the code...
textwrap.dedent() could help here, although it'd be a little annoying
to use because we want the image details to be indented and we can't
know the correct indent in advance, so we'd have to do a two-step
process along the lines of
msg = textwrap.dedent(f"""
The following images are stale and can be purged from the registry:
STALE_DETAILS
...
""")
print(msg.replace("STALE_DETAILS", stale_details))
A bit more cumbersome, but still preferable when it comes to
readability IMHO.
One last thing: we should end this message with something along the
lines of
You can generate a personal access token here:
{self.args.gitlab_uri}/-/profile/personal_access_tokens
> +++ b/ci/util.py
> +def get_image_distro(image_name: str):
Missing '-> str' here, I think.
--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
