On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 13:26 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 02:00:55PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-03-11 at 12:33 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > Sure it would be nice if there was a meson extension that dealt > > > with SELinux, but we need to implement something that works with > > > the meson releases that exist today. If meson gains selinux > > > support in future may be we can consider it then. > > > > We still need make for syntax-check though, so rewriting the SELinux > > bits to Meson doesn't allow us to drop the dependency. And, > > considering how complex and widely used the syntax-check logic is, I > > don't see that being reimplemented anytime soon. > > That's only part of the test suite, and we don't even include > syntax-check if not running from git, because it is only targetted > at upstream maintainers. So that's quite different from including > use of make in the primary build process. That is just not ok IMHO. Mh, fair enough. I guess we can drop BuildRequires: make from our .spec files then... I'll post a patch right away. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
