On 3/9/21 1:23 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Tue, 2021-03-09 at 17:44 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
One of the conventions we have had since the early days of libvirt is
that every struct typedef, has a corresponding "Ptr" typedef too.
For example
typedef struct _virDomainDef virDomainDef;
typedef virDomainDef *virDomainDefPtr;
Periodically someone has questioned what the purpose of these Ptr
typedefs is, and we've not had an compelling answer, other than
that's what we've always done.
[...]
Does anyone have suggestions for how these "Ptr" typedefs are
benefiting libvirt ? Would anyone miss them ?
I consider them pointless obfuscation and would love to see them go.
Yep. I've never seen the point either (especially after we realized the
problem with const pointers several years ago); I just followed along
blindly because that was the convention and I figured *someone* must
have a special place in their heart for them. I wouldn't bat an eye if
they were removed.
