Re: [PATCH v2 13/13] kbase: Document virtio-mem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 14:31:08 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> This commit adds new memorydevices.rst page which should serve
> all models of memory devices. Yet, I'm documenting virtio-mem
> quirks only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  docs/kbase/index.rst         |   4 +
>  docs/kbase/memorydevices.rst | 160 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  docs/kbase/meson.build       |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 165 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 docs/kbase/memorydevices.rst
> 
> diff --git a/docs/kbase/index.rst b/docs/kbase/index.rst
> index 532804fe05..45450bf33b 100644
> --- a/docs/kbase/index.rst
> +++ b/docs/kbase/index.rst
> @@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ Usage
>  `PCI topology <../pci-addresses.html>`__
>     Addressing schemes for PCI devices
>  
> +`Memory devices <memorydevices.html>`__
> +   Memory devices and their use
> +
> +
>  Internals / Debugging
>  ---------------------
>  
> diff --git a/docs/kbase/memorydevices.rst b/docs/kbase/memorydevices.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..23adf54e16
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/docs/kbase/memorydevices.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
> +==============
> +Memory devices
> +==============
> +
> +.. contents::
> +
> +Basics
> +======
> +
> +Memory devices can be divided into two families: DIMMs and NVDIMMs. The former
> +is typical RAM memory: it's volatile and thus its contents doesn't survive
> +reboots nor guest shut downs and power ons. The latter retains its contents
> +across reboots or power outages.
> +
> +In Libvirt, there are two models for DIMMs:
> +
> +* ``dimm`` model:
> +
> +  ::
> +
> +    <memory model='dimm'>
> +      <target>
> +        <size unit='KiB'>523264</size>
> +        <node>0</node>
> +      </target>
> +      <address type='dimm' slot='0'/>
> +    </memory>
> +
> +* ``virtio-mem`` model:
> +
> +  ::
> +
> +    <memory model='virtio-mem'>
> +      <target>
> +        <size unit='KiB'>1048576</size>
> +        <node>0</node>
> +        <block unit='KiB'>2048</block>
> +        <requested unit='KiB'>524288</requested>
> +      </target>
> +      <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x02' function='0x0'/>
> +    </memory>
> +
> +Then there are two models for NVDIMMs:
> +
> +* ``nvidmm`` model:
> +
> +  ::
> +
> +    <memory model='nvdimm'>
> +      <source>
> +        <path>/tmp/nvdimm</path>
> +      </source>
> +      <target>
> +        <size unit='KiB'>523264</size>
> +        <node>0</node>
> +      </target>
> +      <address type='dimm' slot='0'/>
> +    </memory>
> +
> +* ``virtio-pmem`` model:
> +
> +  ::
> +
> +    <memory model='virtio-pmem' access='shared'>
> +      <source>
> +        <path>/tmp/virtio_pmem</path>
> +      </source>
> +      <target>
> +        <size unit='KiB'>524288</size>
> +      </target>
> +      <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x05' function='0x0'/>
> +    </memory>
> +
> +
> +Please not that (maybe somewhat surprisingly) virtio models go onto PCI bus

s/not/note/

> +instead of DIMM slots.
> +
> +Furthermore, DIMMs can have ``<source/>`` element which configures backend for
> +devices. For NVDIMMs the element is mandatory and reflects where the contents
> +is saved.
> +
> +See https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsMemory

Please use a relative link inside of the libvirt project. You might need
to enclose it.

> +``virtio-mem`` model
> +====================
> +
> +The ``virtio-mem`` model can be viewed as revised memory balloon. It offers
> +memory hotplug and hotunplug solution (without the actual hotplug of the

I'd say 'adding and removing of memory without actual hotplug or unplug
of devices'.

> +device). It solves problems that memory balloon can't solve on its own and thus
> +is more flexible than DIMM + balloon solution. ``virtio-mem`` is NUMA aware,
> +and thus memory can be inflated/deflated only for a subset of guest NUMA nodes.
> +Also, it works with chunks that are either exposed to guest or taken back from
> +it.
> +
> +See https://virtio-mem.gitlab.io/
> +
> +Under the hood, ``virtio-mem`` device is split into chunks of equal size which
> +are then exposed to the guest. Either all of them or only a portion depending
> +on user's request. Therefore there are three important sizes for
> +``virtio-mem``. All are to be found under ``<target/>`` element:
> +
> +#. The maximum size the device can ever offer, exposed under ``<size/>``
> +#. The size a single block, exposed under ``<block/>``

size of a

> +#. The current size exposed to the guest, exposed under ``<requested/>``
> +
> +For instance, the following example the maximum size is 4GiB, the block size is
> +2MiB and only 1GiB should be exposed to the guest:
> +
> +  ::
> +
> +    <memory model='virtio-mem'>
> +      <target>
> +        <size unit='KiB'>4194304</size>
> +        <block unit='KiB'>2048</block>
> +        <requested unit='KiB'>1048576</requested>
> +      </target>
> +    </memory>
> +
> +Please note that ``<requested/>`` must be an integer multiple of ``<block/>``
> +size or zero (memory completely deflated) and has to be less or equal to
> +``<size/>`` (memory completely inflated). Furthermore, QEMU recommends the

I'd avoid inflated/deflated since it has exactly the opposite meaning
with memballoon.

> +``<block/>`` size to be as big as a Transparent Huge Page (usually 2MiB).
> +
> +To change the size exposed to the guest, users should pass memory device XML
> +with nothing but ``<requested/>`` changed into the
> +``virDomainUpdateDeviceFlags()`` API. For user's convenience this can be done
> +via virsh too:
> +
> + ::
> +
> +   # virsh update-memory-device $dom --requested size 2GiB
> +
> +If there are two or more ``<memory/>`` devices then ``--alias`` shall be used
> +to tell virsh which memory device should be updated.
> +
> +For running guests there is fourth size that can be found under ``<target/>``:
> +
> +  ::
> +
> +    <actual unit='KiB'>2097152</actual>
> +
> +The ``<actual/>`` reflects the actual size consumed by the guest. In general it

s/consumed/used/

> +can differ from ``<requested/>``. Reasons include guest kernel missing
> +``virtio-mem`` module and thus being unable to take offered memory, or guest
> +kernel being unable to free memory and allow deflation.  Since ``<actual/>``

s/and allow deflation//

> +only reports size to users, the element is never parsed. It is formatted only
> +into live XML.
> +
> +Since changing actual allocation requires cooperation with guest kernel,
> +requests for change are not instant. Therefore, libvirt emits
> +``VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_ID_MEMORY_DEVICE_SIZE_CHANGE`` event whenever actual
> +allocation changed.
> +
> +Please not that using ``virtio-mem`` with memory balloon is not possible,
> +currently. The real reason is that libvirt's memory accounting isn't ready and
> +mixing these two would be confusing to users. Libvirt exposes current value of
> +memory balloon under ``<currentMemory/>`` but if it were to account for
> +``<actual/>`` too then it would be impossible to learn true size of the
> +balloon. Also it might result in mistakenly trying to deflate ``virtio-mem``
> +via ``setmem`` command.




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux