Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] libvirtd: Better initscript error reporting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/24/2010 01:17 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Cole Robinson on 2/24/2010 10:55 AM:
>> >From time to time I bork my install, and hate it when the initscript
>> returns no info. This patch makes things a bit more clear.
>>
>> +LIBVIRTD_BIN="@sbindir@/libvirtd"
>> +
>>  # Sanity checks.
>> -[ -x @sbindir@/libvirtd ] || exit 0
>> +[ ! -e $LIBVIRTD_BIN ] && echo "$LIBVIRTD_BIN not found." && exit 1
> 
> Why the switch from -x to -e?  If libvirtd is missing executable
> permissions, it can now get through this check whereas before it exited early.
> 

Sorry, I meant to comment about this.

I figured in that case we can just let the libvirtd command fail, which should
report the lack of permissions. This saves us the hassle of having to report
'$BIN not found or lacks execute permissions.'

But I guess by that logic we can just drop the check and explicit error
reporting altogether: this stuff should really only error if the user screwed
up the install, so they can decode 'command not found' and 'permission denied'
errors. I'll send a new patch.

Thanks,
Cole

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]