Il giorno mer, 24/02/2010 alle 08.21 -0700, Eric Blake ha scritto:
> Just curious: Why the choice of AFX_, and not something like LV_ for libvirt?
Because I plan to finish this up and send it down to autoconf-archive
asap as it's not the first time I have to get something like this ;)
> The shell expansion ${a#b} is not portable to Solaris /bin/sh. Is that a
> problem for libvirt, or are we Linux-centric enough to not care?
That's definitely a problem I didn't think about, I was expecting POSIX
shell to support that, but I'll look for another way.
> Underquoted; if the AC_MSG_ERROR were ever changed to contain a comma,
> then this would be passing an unintentional extra argument to
> AC_SEARCH_LIBS.
I have to double check that one but I think that if I were to quote that
it wouldn't expand properly.
> Is this something that would be worth wrapping in an AC_CACHE_CHECK, to
> avoid repeating the check if config.cache exists?
The inner check is already cached, so I don't think there is much need
for adding one further cache…
But this actually made me think that we might as well just use
AC_SEARCH_LIB and rely on the value stored in the cache to begin with so
I'll send a different version in a moment.
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes”
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is,
it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list