On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 18:17:36 +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 17:16:14 +0100, Tim Wiederhake wrote:
> > Preparation for later conversion to g_auto* memory handling.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tim Wiederhake <twiederh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > tests/commandhelper.c | 10 ++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/commandhelper.c b/tests/commandhelper.c
> > index 05e3879688..2be121ce2c 100644
> > --- a/tests/commandhelper.c
> > +++ b/tests/commandhelper.c
> > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) {
> > ssize_t got;
> >
> > if (!log)
> > - return ret;
> > + goto cleanup;
> >
> > for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) {
> > fprintf(log, "ARG:%s\n", argv[i]);
> > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) {
> > }
> >
> > if (!(newenv = malloc(sizeof(*newenv) * n)))
> > - abort();
> > + goto cleanup;
>
> Any reason for not converting this malloc to g_new directly? you get rid
> of abort()/cleanup entirely.
>
> Especially since the patches at the end of the series switch to
> g_auto(ptr).
>
> If there's a strong reason against using glibs allocators, in such case
> the cleanups shouldn't be added either.
Using glibs allocators would simplify also further patches, so if there
isn't a particular reason why you chose to use calloc it would seem
better to use g_new right away and prevent adding additional cleanup
labels.
