On 1/28/21 4:15 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:
Sadly, the replies changes for older QEMUs are synthetic. Separated for easier review. Also available on gitlab: git fetch https://gitlab.com/janotomko/libvirt/ virtiofs-bootindex https://gitlab.com/janotomko/libvirt/-/tree/virtiofs-bootindex And a broken pipeline: https://gitlab.com/janotomko/libvirt/-/pipelines/248162273 Ján Tomko (7): tests: switch vhost-user-fs-hugepages to use boot order conf: add boot order to filesystem qemu: add QEMU_CAPS_VHOST_USER_FS_BOOTINDEX fixup: vhost-user-fs-device properties fixup: renumber Add validation for virtiofs boot order setting qemu: format bootindex for vhost-user-fs docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 3 + src/conf/domain_conf.c | 5 +- src/conf/domain_validate.c | 17 ++- src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 8 + src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 1 + src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 3 + src/qemu/qemu_validate.c | 6 + .../caps_4.2.0.aarch64.replies | 131 ++++++++++++---- .../caps_4.2.0.s390x.replies | 119 ++++++++++++--- .../caps_4.2.0.x86_64.replies | 131 ++++++++++++---- .../caps_5.0.0.aarch64.replies | 136 +++++++++++++---- .../caps_5.0.0.ppc64.replies | 124 +++++++++++++--- .../caps_5.0.0.riscv64.replies | 120 ++++++++++++--- .../caps_5.0.0.x86_64.replies | 136 +++++++++++++---- .../caps_5.1.0.x86_64.replies | 136 +++++++++++++---- .../caps_5.2.0.aarch64.replies | 136 +++++++++++++---- .../caps_5.2.0.ppc64.replies | 124 +++++++++++++--- .../caps_5.2.0.riscv64.replies | 120 ++++++++++++--- .../caps_5.2.0.s390x.replies | 124 +++++++++++++--- .../caps_5.2.0.x86_64.replies | 136 +++++++++++++---- .../caps_6.0.0.x86_64.replies | 140 ++++++++++++++---- .../caps_6.0.0.x86_64.xml | 1 + ...vhost-user-fs-hugepages.x86_64-latest.args | 3 +- .../vhost-user-fs-hugepages.xml | 3 +- 24 files changed, 1534 insertions(+), 329 deletions(-)
Hopefully, you'll squash 4/7 and 5/7 into 3/7 so that we're able to compile && test after each commit.
Also, news entry would be nice (it's fine a follow up patch). Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> Michal
