Eric Blake wrote: > According to Jim Meyering on 2/19/2010 6:50 AM: >>> Why the change in .gnulib? Shouldn't that be an independent patch? >> >> Well spotted. >> I saw it too, and (as you probably noticed) removed it >> from the updated patch. > > I still see it in your most recent post: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-February/msg00698.html Humph ;-) Well I did remove it, but then pulled it back in with an --amend. Thanks! -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list