> > The current schema is more permissive than the XML parsing code in > > libvirt. Precisely, 'match' attribute is optional in schema while in > > reality its use is bound to <model> element: > > > > - <cpu> element without 'match' attribute is allowed only if <topology> > > element is the only child element of <cpu> > > > > - <cpu> element with 'match' attribute requires <model> element to be > > present; <topology> and <feature> elements are optional > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > ACK, but there is a limit to this kind of refinements. Basically > the schemas will always have to be more permissive than the internals, > for example some constructs are allowed only for some values of > attribute type on top level element, and except making the schemas > unmaintainable, I don't think it's feasible to have the RNG model > exactly the actual set accepted. It's really 2 different models of > validation. Sure thing, I considered this was within the limit and I think it also made that part of schema a bit more readable. Thanks, pushed. Jirka -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list