On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 6:09 AM Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2020-10-05 at 20:42 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 2:40 PM Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > -%define with_fuse 0%{!?_without_fuse:0}
> > > -%define with_sanlock 0%{!?_without_sanlock:0}
> > > -%define with_numad 0%{!?_without_numad:0}
> > > -%define with_firewalld 0%{!?_without_firewalld:0}
> > > -%define with_firewalld_zone 0%{!?_without_firewalld_zone:0}
> > > -%define with_libssh2 0%{!?_without_libssh2:0}
> > > -%define with_wireshark 0%{!?_without_wireshark:0}
> > > -%define with_libssh 0%{!?_without_libssh:0}
> > > -%define with_bash_completion 0%{!?_without_bash_completion:0}
> > > +%define with_fuse 0
> > > +%define with_sanlock 0
> > > +%define with_numad 0
> > > +%define with_firewalld 0
> > > +%define with_firewalld_zone 0
> > > +%define with_libssh2 0
> > > +%define with_wireshark 0
> > > +%define with_libssh 0
> > > +%define with_bash_completion 0
> >
> > This crazy setup is an attempt to implement rpm %bcond behavior
> > without actually using %bcond statements. Instead of removing the
> > right-hand-side conditionals, perhaps it'd be better to just finally
> > make the switch to %bcond statements.
>
> Do you have any idea what the availability of %bcond is?
> Specifically, can we use it on RHEL 7? If so, I can take a stab at
> converting our spec file, but I don't think that invalidates the
> current series and I would prefer it to be merged first. It will be a
> better starting point for the conversion anyway.
>
%bcond support has been around since 2000. :)
If this is merged first, I can then convert them to %bconds...
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
