On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 03:39:03PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 3:00 PM Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 18:38:18 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > > On Thu, 2020-09-24 at 15:13 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > > > I have just tagged v6.8.0-rc1 in the repository and pushed signed > > > > tarballs and source RPMs to https://libvirt.org/sources/ > > > > > > Can we please stop generating and publishing the source RPMs? They're > > > of little use considering that you can easily run > > > > > > $ rpmbuild -ta libvirt-x.y.z.tar.xz > > > > > > to obtain RPMs from a release archive, so all they really do is > > > clutter the directory listing. > > > > The nice thing about the source RPMs is that they are internally signed > > (in contrast to an external signature in *.asc for tarballs). Personally > > I don't find them useful either, but some people may think otherwise and > > I'm not sure they will raise their voice here. We could just stop > > creating source RPMs and wait if anyone complains. Or we could be a > > little bit more conservative and just move them to a subdirectory > > perhaps. I don't mind either way. > > > > I like that Source RPMs are produced, because I can trivially use them > in my import->build->test pipeline, since my build system accepts > SRPMs as input and not random tarballs. :) If you have the tarball you can trivially generate the source RPM if you need it because the tarball still contains the .spec file. IOW just run $ rpmbuild -ts libvirt-6.7.0.tar.xz Wrote: /home/berrange/rpmbuild/SRPMS/libvirt-6.7.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
