On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 09:03:53AM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 05:16:25PM -0500, Chris Lalancette wrote: > > > >> I suspect you have to run "cd src ; make rpcgen", and then check the resulting > >> src/remote/remote_protocol.c and src/remote/remote_protocol.h into the > >> repository to get things to work again. > >> > > > > Yep, don't worry about this - I've re-generated & pushed the files > > > > Oops. I was wondering how the generated rpc files were handled but then > forgot to ask before committing the patches. So whenever > remote_protocol.x is modified, developer must regenerate > remote_protocol.[ch] and include those in the corresponding patch > correct? I can send a patch to update the "API extensions" doc but want > to make sure I understand the process correctly. Yes, that is correct. Also note that this causes some of the server side files in daemon/ to be re-generated too Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list