Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 07:21:15PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > > Currently, slot 1 is only allowed to be used by the LPC device. > > Relax this requirement and allow to use slot 1 if it was explicitly > > specified by the user for any other device type. In this case the LPC > > device will have the next available address. > > > > If slot 1 was not used by the user, it'll be reserved for the LPC > > device, even if it is not configured to make address assignment > > consistent in case the LPC device becomes necessary (e.g. the user > > adds a console or a video device which require LPC). > > > > Signed-off-by: Roman Bogorodskiy <bogorodskiy@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > po/POTFILES.in | 1 - > > src/bhyve/bhyve_device.c | 50 +++++++++---------- > > ...argv-addr-non-isa-controller-on-slot-1.xml | 1 + > > tests/bhyvexml2argvtest.c | 2 +- > > 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > We're missing the bhyvexml2argv-addr-non-isa-controller-on-slot-1.args > file from the commit, so this breaks CI. I presume you forgot to commit > it from your local checkout. Indeed, I'll add that shortly. Sorry for the breakage. > > Regards, > Daniel > -- > |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| > |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| > |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| > Roman Bogorodskiy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature