On 07/08/2020 18.22, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 20/07/2020 12.22, Thomas Huth wrote: >> qemuAgentFSInfoToPublic() currently only sets the devAlias for PCI devices. >> However, the QEMU guest agent could also provide the device name in the >> "dev" field of the response for other devices instead (well, at least after >> fixing another problem in the current QEMU guest agent...). So if creating >> the devAlias from the PCI information failed, let's fall back to the name >> provided by the guest agent. This helps to fix the empty "Target" fields >> that occur when running "virsh domfsinfo" on s390x where CCW devices are >> used for the guest instead of PCI devices. >> >> Also add a proper debug message here in case we completely failed to set the >> device alias, since this problem here was very hard to debug: The only two >> error messages that I've seen were "Unable to get filesystem information" >> and "Unable to encode message payload" - which only indicates that something >> went wrong in the RPC call. No debug message indicated the real problem, so >> I had to learn the hard way why the RPC call failed (it apparently does not >> like devAlias left to be NULL) and where the real problem comes from. >> >> Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755075 >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 19 +++++++++++-------- >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c >> index d185666ed8..e45c61ee20 100644 >> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c >> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c >> @@ -21935,14 +21935,17 @@ qemuAgentFSInfoToPublic(qemuAgentFSInfoPtr agent, >> qemuAgentDiskInfoPtr agentdisk = agent->disks[i]; >> virDomainDiskDefPtr diskDef; >> >> - if (!(diskDef = virDomainDiskByAddress(vmdef, >> - &agentdisk->pci_controller, >> - agentdisk->bus, >> - agentdisk->target, >> - agentdisk->unit))) >> - continue; >> - >> - ret->devAlias[i] = g_strdup(diskDef->dst); >> + diskDef = virDomainDiskByAddress(vmdef, >> + &agentdisk->pci_controller, >> + agentdisk->bus, >> + agentdisk->target, >> + agentdisk->unit); >> + if (diskDef != NULL) >> + ret->devAlias[i] = g_strdup(diskDef->dst); >> + else if (agentdisk->devnode != NULL) >> + ret->devAlias[i] = g_strdup(agentdisk->devnode); >> + else >> + VIR_DEBUG("Missing devnode name for '%s'.", ret->mountpoint); >> } >> >> return ret; >> > > Friendly ping! > > Any more comments here? Is it ok this way or shall I change the order? Ping again! Is the patch ok, or do I have to rework it? Thomas
