[question] cpumap: why 'mpx' removed from Cooperlake model?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: [question] cpumap: why 'mpx' removed from Cooperlake model?
From: "Wangxin (Alexander)" <wangxinxin.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:50:15 +0000
Accept-language: zh-CN, en-US
Cc: "phrdina@xxxxxxxxxx" <phrdina@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Huangweidong \(C\)" <weidong.huang@xxxxxxxxxx>

Hi, Jiri

I just compared the cpu features between the 'x86_Cooperlake.xml ' and 'x86_Cascadelake-Server.xml',
the feature 'mpx' seems removed from the Cooperlake model. Is there a reason? 
And what rules do we follow to add or remove CPU features?

Regards,
Xin

Prev by Date: [libvirt PATCH 0.5/2] meson: link libm
Next by Date: Re: [libvirt PATCH 0.5/2] meson: link libm
Previous by thread: [RFC PATCH 0/3] qemu: Propagate cluster size to new qcow2 images
Next by thread: Re: [question] cpumap: why 'mpx' removed from Cooperlake model?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Virt Tools] [Libvirt Users] [Lib OS Info] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux