I've got confused with the naming yes, as I supposed create was doing the same as it does in virsh api, my mistake. Maybe it would be a good idea to rename that method and others to the virsh naming. thanks a lot guys, 2010/2/2, Bryan Kearney <bkearney@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 02/02/2010 05:44 AM, Matthias Bolte wrote: >> 2010/2/2 Marc Gonzalez Mateo<marcg@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>> Good morning, >>> >>> Testing the new java version (0.4.1) I've noticed that there's no >>> .start() >>> method to start a defined or shuted down domain. >>> >>> Are you working on it or is it a minor feature not to be considered? >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >>> >> >> Why do you think there should be a method called start? >> >> The Java bindings bind the C API, not the virsh commands. The C API >> function to start a domain is called virDomainCreate. The Java >> bindings bind this function to the create method of the Domain class. >> >> Matthias > > > As Matthias has said, these are tracking the C API. Having said that, > where in the doco would you have liked to have seen this? I will agree > that create is not an obvious word to look for if all you have seen is > the virsh api. > > -- bk > -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list