On Wed, 2020-08-19 at 16:29 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > Right now we're unconditionally adding RPATH information to the > installed binaries and libraries, but that's not always desired. > > autotools seem to be smart enough to only include that information > when targeting a non-standard prefix, so most distro packages > don't actually contain it; moreover, both Debian and Fedora have > wiki pages encouraging packagers to avoid setting RPATH: > > https://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RPath_Packaging_Draft > > Implement RPATH logic that Does The Right Thing™ in the most > common cases, while still offering users the ability to override > the default behavior if they have specific needs. > > Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > meson.build | 10 ++++++++++ > meson_options.txt | 1 + > src/meson.build | 12 ++++++------ > tools/meson.build | 8 ++++---- > 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) A polite ping. We should really make sure 6.7.0 includes this, because dealing with the RPATH situation will be pretty annoying for distros otherwise. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
