Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:14:39AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> This close(fd) is reachable with an "fd" of -1 via
>> the "goto cleanup" just before &fd is first set.
>> While closing(-1) is not a big problem, it is a failing
>> syscall, and would show up on an strace audit, not to mention
>> the coverity and maybe-clang warnings.
>>
>> >From c69369c445be53f12ec09a176fd477b9ff16bbff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jim Meyering <meyering@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:11:49 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] storage_backend.c: avoid closing a negative file descriptor
>>
>> * src/storage/storage_backend.c (virStorageBackendRunProgRegex):
>> Don't close a negative (read-only) file descriptor.
>> ---
>> src/storage/storage_backend.c | 8 +++++---
>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend.c b/src/storage/storage_backend.c
>> index bc656f2..84eb8aa 100644
>> --- a/src/storage/storage_backend.c
>> +++ b/src/storage/storage_backend.c
>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>> /*
>> * storage_backend.c: internal storage driver backend contract
>> *
>> - * Copyright (C) 2007-2009 Red Hat, Inc.
>> + * Copyright (C) 2007-2010 Red Hat, Inc.
>> * Copyright (C) 2007-2008 Daniel P. Berrange
>> *
>> * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>> @@ -1326,8 +1326,10 @@ virStorageBackendRunProgRegex(virConnectPtr conn,
>>
>> if (list)
>> fclose(list);
>> - else
>> - close(fd);
>> + else {
>> + if (0 <= fd)
>> + close(fd);
>> + }
>
> Can you put conditionals the normal way around with variable being tested
> coming first.
Yeah. Forgot.
"Normal" is context sensitive.
In many other places where I contribute, "normal" means "<" and "<=",
but no (or very few) uses of ">" or ">=". Definitely an acquired habit.
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list