On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 01:13:16PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote: > On a Monday in 2020, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 14:30:30 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote: > > > On a Monday in 2020, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > > Remove the gray background and switch to underlined links. > > > > > > > > > > Here, I prefer the old look. The difference with the ToC might be > > > that the ToC entries are indented. > > > > Both links and background? In case you prefer the old links I might want > > to get rid of the background at least. > > > > Sorry, I only compared the overall look. > > After some experimenting, what concerns me most is the spacing: > > In the old version the gray panel aligns with the 'Knowledge base' > heading. > > In the white one, the K aligns with 'Debug logs' and it's too close > to the heading. > > So I miss mostly: > padding: 0.5 em; > that came from the panel. > > 1. I'm okay with dropping the gray background, since the kbase page is > different. (The bikeshedding question is: will we eventually fill it > enough to warrant a return of the gray panels and put three of them > on a computer screen?) As we migrate the wiki content it'll mostly end up in the kbase, and I expect we'll want to split the kbase index into a series of groups with panels, like we do for the main docs page and front page. This was the main reason why I had the page rendered the way it currently is. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
