Re: [PATCH v3 1/3 (for 6.6.0)] resctrl: Use exclusive lock for /sys/fs/resctrl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On a Wednesday in 2020, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Wed, 2020-07-29 at 13:43 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
That's the way it should've been all the time.  It was originally the case, but
then the rework to virFileFlock() made the function ambiguous when it was
created in commit 5a0a5f7fb5f5, and due to that it was misused in commit
657ddeff2313 and since then the lock being taken was shared rather than
exclusive.

Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 src/util/virresctrl.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Consider this

 Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx>

and safe for freeze, but honestly this issue has been around for more
than two years at this point so I'm not entirely convinced it can't
just wait for the merge window to open again. Up to you.

The merge window is open. We are in a feature freeze, meaning we are
free to push bug fixes. Possibly trivial typos in the CI configuration.

A freeze meaing "we do not push anything at all" is pointless.

Jano


--
Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux