On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 16:14:03 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 03:59:58PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 15:57:16 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 03:18:23PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 11:59:17 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > docs/Makefile.am | 26 --------------------- > > > > > scripts/meson-html-gen.py | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > scripts/meson.build | 1 + > > > > > 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > > > > create mode 100755 scripts/meson-html-gen.py > > > > [...] > > > > > > > +) > > > > > + > > > > > +html = subprocess.run( > > > > > + [args.xmllint, '--nonet', '--format', '-'], > > > > > + input=html_tmp.stdout, > > > > > + stdout=subprocess.PIPE, > > > > > + stderr=subprocess.PIPE, > > > > > > > > We can then do this as separate stage. > > > > > > What do you mean by separate stage? Not following here. > > > > I was arguing that the reformatting done by xmllint can be done as a > > separate build target thus eliminating the need to have this script > > completely. > > Right, I guess now it can be done like that since there is not the part > that modified the string directly in python. However, I would like to > keep it like this. Well, and I don't like the extra python wrapper which obscures what is happening. Arguably we could write everything ourselves and just invoke a massive script from make/meson/whatever. > We will not have temporary files in the build directory. With two > targets the temporary file should not be removed otherwise ninja would > rebuild it every single time and that would cause to rebuild the > resulting HTML as well. Umm there's plenty of temporary stuff in the build directory. I don't think we care.
