Re: [RFC v2 1/1] memory: Delete assertion in memory_region_unregister_iommu_notifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/1] memory: Delete assertion in memory_region_unregister_iommu_notifier
From: Peter Xu <peterx@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:45:40 -0400
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>, "libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx" <libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juan Quintela <quintela@xxxxxxxxxx>, qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@xxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <ff9e7af0-18c4-57e8-fc94-904fdce1123a@redhat.com>
References: <20200626064122.9252-2-eperezma@redhat.com> <20200626212917.GD175520@xz-x1> <8cf25190-53e6-8cbb-372b-e3d4ec714dc5@redhat.com> <20200628144746.GA239443@xz-x1> <54d2cdfd-97b8-9e1d-a607-d7a5e96be3a1@redhat.com> <20200629133403.GA266532@xz-x1> <2589d0e9-cc5b-a4df-8790-189b49f1a40e@redhat.com> <20200630153911.GD3138@xz-x1> <69f6d6e7-a0b1-abae-894e-4e81b7e0cc90@redhat.com> <ff9e7af0-18c4-57e8-fc94-904fdce1123a@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 11:01:54AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> So I think we agree that a new notifier is needed?

Good to me, or a new flag should be easier (IOMMU_NOTIFIER_DEV_IOTLB)?

-- 
Peter Xu

Prev by Date: [PATCH 14/24] backup: Allow configuring incremental backup per-disk individually
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 00/24] qemu: Incremental backup and TLS handling fixes
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC v2 1/1] memory: Delete assertion in memory_region_unregister_iommu_notifier
Next by thread: Re: [RFC v2 1/1] memory: Delete assertion in memory_region_unregister_iommu_notifier
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Virt Tools] [Libvirt Users] [Lib OS Info] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools]

Powered by Linux