On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 23:34:00 -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/network/bridge_driver.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------- > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/network/bridge_driver.c b/src/network/bridge_driver.c > index 668aa9ca88..a1b2f5b6c7 100644 > --- a/src/network/bridge_driver.c > +++ b/src/network/bridge_driver.c [...] > @@ -706,7 +706,8 @@ networkStateInitialize(bool privileged, > > network_driver->lockFD = -1; > if (virMutexInit(&network_driver->lock) < 0) { > - VIR_FREE(network_driver); > + g_free(network_driver); > + network_driver = NULL; > goto error; In general I'm agains senseless replacement of VIR_FREE for g_free. There is IMO no value to do so. VIR_FREE is now implemented via g_clear_pointer(&ptr, g_free) so g_free is actually used. Mass replacements are also substrate for adding bugs and need to be approached carefully, so doing this en-mass might lead to others attempting the same with possibly less care. In general, mass replacements should be done only to g_clear_pointer(&ptr, g_free) and I'm not sure it's worth it.