On a Wednesday in 2020, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
This tests aims to exercise how a TPM Proxy device can be added in the domain, either alone or with a regular TPM device. It also ensures that we do not allow bogus scenarios to slip by. Tested-by: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@xxxxxxxxx> --- tests/qemuxml2argvdata/ppc64-tpm-double.xml | 34 ++++++++++++++ .../ppc64-tpmproxy-double.xml | 38 +++++++++++++++ .../ppc64-tpmproxy-single.xml | 33 +++++++++++++ .../ppc64-tpmproxy-with-tpm.xml | 36 +++++++++++++++ tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c | 12 +++++ .../ppc64-tpmproxy-single.ppc64-latest.xml | 42 +++++++++++++++++ .../ppc64-tpmproxy-with-tpm.ppc64-latest.xml | 46 +++++++++++++++++++ tests/qemuxml2xmltest.c | 2 + 8 files changed, 243 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/ppc64-tpm-double.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/ppc64-tpmproxy-double.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/ppc64-tpmproxy-single.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/ppc64-tpmproxy-with-tpm.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/ppc64-tpmproxy-single.ppc64-latest.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/ppc64-tpmproxy-with-tpm.ppc64-latest.xml
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@xxxxxxxxxx> Jano
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
