Re: bugifx: fix some wrong usage of ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/8/20 7:52 PM, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
For the attached patch:


Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@xxxxxxxxx>

I'm not against the diff, but ...


On 6/6/20 7:30 AM, Bihong Yu wrote:
There are some wrong usage of ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL, which may cause the compilation fail. The ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL is the define of __attribute__((__nonnull__(m))), which declares that the input pointer parameter of funciton should not be NULL. If we declare some input pointer parameter of the function is ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL, the function should not redundancy check of the pointer parameter. And the ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL can only be using to pointer.


This ^^ is unrelated (even though it's a mistake as there is another patch with this explanation that fixes ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL),

From 55cd85345b2dc50f44c1e382563482d40142382b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: yubihong <yubihong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:44:43 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] qemu: fix code format problem


But this is not qemu related. Can you please resend the patch with proper prefix? E.g. libvirt-domain: Fix indentation

And mention in the commit message what functions are fixed?

Thanks,
Michal




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux