Re: [PATCH 5/5] qemuProcessUpdateCPU: do not change 'fallback' to ALLOW for pSeries guests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 5/25/20 7:38 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 16:56:20 -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Commit v3.10.0-182-g237f045d9a ("qemu: Ignore fallback CPU attribute
on reconnect") forced CPU 'fallback' to ALLOW, regardless of user
choice. This fixed a situation in which guests created with older
Libvirt versions, which used CPU mode 'host-model' in runtime, would
fail to launch in a newer Libvirt if the fallback was set to FORBID.
This would lead to a scenario where the CPU was translated to 'host-model'
to 'custom', but then the FORBID setting would make the translation
process fail.

This fix has a side effect for PSeries guests. PSeries can operate
with 'host-model' in runtime due to specific PPC64 mechanics regarding
compatibility mode. In fact, the update() implementation of the
cpuDriverPPC64 driver is a NO-OP if CPU mode is 'host-model', and
the driver does not implement translate(). The result is that PSeries
guests aren't affected by the problem, but they are being affected by
the fix - users are seeing 'fallback' mode being changed without
necessity during daemon restart.

All other cpuArchDrivers implements update() and changes guest mode
to VIR_CPU_MODE_CUSTOM, meaning that PSeries is currently the only
exception to this logic. Let's make it official.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1660711

CC: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 8 +++++++-
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
index a1ef1d42b0..fec1720f33 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
@@ -4347,8 +4347,14 @@ qemuProcessUpdateCPU(virQEMUDriverPtr driver,
/* The host CPU model comes from host caps rather than QEMU caps so
       * fallback must be allowed no matter what the user specified in the XML.
+     *
+     * Note: PSeries domains are able to run with host-model CPU by design,
+     * even on Libvirt newer than 2.3, never replacing host-model with
+     * custom in the virCPUUpdate() call prior to this function. It is not
+     * needed to change the user defined 'fallback' attribute in this case.
       */
-    vm->def->cpu->fallback = VIR_CPU_FALLBACK_ALLOW;
+    if (!qemuDomainIsPSeries(vm->def))
+        vm->def->cpu->fallback = VIR_CPU_FALLBACK_ALLOW;
if (qemuProcessFetchGuestCPU(driver, vm, asyncJob, &cpu, &disabled) < 0)
          return -1;

qemuProcessUpdateCPU should not be called at all in this case. The
caller (qemuProcessRefreshCPU) is supposed to decide whether the guest
CPU needs to be changed:

     /* If the domain with a host-model CPU was started by an old libvirt
      * (< 2.3) which didn't replace the CPU with a custom one, let's do it now
      * since the rest of our code does not really expect a host-model CPU in a
      * running domain.
      */
     if (vm->def->cpu->mode == VIR_CPU_MODE_HOST_MODEL) {
         if (!(hostmig = virCPUCopyMigratable(host->arch, host)))
             return -1;

         if (!(cpu = virCPUDefCopyWithoutModel(hostmig)) ||
             virCPUDefCopyModelFilter(cpu, hostmig, false,
                                      virQEMUCapsCPUFilterFeatures,
                                      &host->arch) < 0)
             return -1;

         if (virCPUUpdate(vm->def->os.arch, vm->def->cpu, cpu) < 0)
             return -1;

         if (qemuProcessUpdateCPU(driver, vm, QEMU_ASYNC_JOB_NONE) < 0)
             return -1;

So better solution would be to move your new comment and check just
after the check for VIR_CPU_MODE_HOST_MODEL:

     if (vm->def->cpu->mode == VIR_CPU_MODE_HOST_MODEL) {
         /* PSeries... */
         if (qemuDomainIsPSeries(vm->def))
             return 0;


Got it. I'll also update the commit msg to mention that the problem resides in
doing the proper handling in qemuProcessRefreshCPU(), and that your patch in
qemuProcessUpdateCPU() I mentioned there simply exposed the problem.



Thanks,

DHB


         ...

Jirka





[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux