Re: [libvirt] Website contains outdated information about remote limitations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2010/1/19 Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 08:27:55PM +0100, Matthias Bolte wrote:
>> http://www.libvirt.org/remote.html#Remote_limitations says:
>>
>> Limitations
>>     * Remote storage: To be fully useful, particularly for creating
>> new domains, it should be possible to enumerate and provision storage
>> on the remote machine. This is currently in the design phase.
>>     * Migration: We expect libvirt will support migration, and
>> obviously remote support is what makes migration worthwhile. This is
>> also in the design phase. Issues to discuss include which path the
>> migration data should follow (eg. client to client direct, or client
>> to server to client) and security.
>>
>> IMHO this is outdated information, because libvirt supports both
>> features now. So both should be removed from the website as they could
>> misinform newbies.
>
> Agreed, that needs to be removed.
>
>
> Daniel
>

Here's a patch for it.

Matthias
From 4205ae5a790c7e4022dcf6250b500a10f4d6b5a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Matthias Bolte <matthias.bolte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:39:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] docs: Remove outdated information about remote limitations

---
 docs/remote.html.in |   10 ----------
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/remote.html.in b/docs/remote.html.in
index 2716ebe..b8b8f2b 100644
--- a/docs/remote.html.in
+++ b/docs/remote.html.in
@@ -811,16 +811,6 @@ should just 'do the right thing(tm)'.
       <a name="Remote_limitations" id="Remote_limitations">Limitations</a>
     </h3>
     <ul>
-      <li> Remote storage: To be fully useful, particularly for
-creating new domains, it should be possible to enumerate
-and provision storage on the remote machine.  This is currently
-in the design phase. </li>
-      <li> Migration: We expect libvirt will support migration,
-and obviously remote support is what makes migration worthwhile.
-This is also in the design phase.  Issues <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list"; title="libvir-list mailing list">to discuss</a> include
-which path the migration data should follow (eg. client to
-client direct, or client to server to client) and security.
-</li>
       <li> Fine-grained authentication: libvirt in general,
 but in particular the remote case should support more
 fine-grained authentication for operations, rather than
-- 
1.6.3.3

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]