On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 12:10 -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 5/4/20 11:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > Can we changes the driver tables to use "Xen" too, now that we got > > rid of the old Xen driver. I can't remember if the driver tables > > names leak out anywhere important ? > > It doesn't appear to be the case, but I only looked quickly and could have > missed something. > > I'll send a patch to change 'name' in the driver tables. With the old Xen driver > gone Andrea and I also discussed renaming the libxl driver to xen, but I'm not > sure it is worth the effort. It seems difficult to remove all references to > libxl. E.g. changing the '--with-libxl' configure option would break external > users/scripts. I think it's fine to make changes to configure options, as long as passing the old options results in a failure rather than silently (not) enabling the driver. Our API stability guarantee thankfully does *not* extend to configure :) On the other hand, Any Minute Now™ we're going to switch to Meson, at which point *all* of the existing options will break and all of the scripts that exist will have to be updated. Maybe we can avoid doing anything to autotools and just make sure the corresponding Meson option is named correctly from day one? Adding Pavel to the conversation. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
