Hello Daniel, Am 20.04.20 um 15:02 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 02:59:38PM +0200, Philipp Hahn wrote: >> Am 20.04.20 um 14:47 schrieb Daniel P. Berrangé: >>> Pytjon 3.5 is the oldest Python version available across our supported ... >>> -if sys.version_info[0] != 3: >>> - print("libvirt-python requires Python 3.x to build") >>> +if sys.version_info[0] != 3 or sys.version_info[1] < 5: >> >> if sys.version_info < (3, 5): > > IIUC, that would not reject Python 4.x, which I presume would be > a backwards incompatible version bump. Yes, that would not reject 4. But lets wait until Python 4 is started to decide if we then want to disable libvirt for it - assume the best and hope it will be (mostly) backward compatible. (many Python 2 program even work with Python 3 and having to change each of them just to while-list the version bump would be a pain.) That would be the "Pythonic" way of doing things. >> plus maybe this: >> >>> diff --git a/setup.py b/setup.py >>> index 56b6eea..e20b7b3 100755 >>> --- a/setup.py >>> +++ b/setup.py >>> @@ -368,5 +368,9 @@ of recent versions of Linux (and other OSes).''', >>> "License :: OSI Approved :: GNU Lesser General Public License v2 or later (LGPLv2+)", >>> "Programming Language :: Python", >>> "Programming Language :: Python :: 3", >>> + "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.5", >>> + "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.6", >>> + "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.7", >>> + "Programming Language :: Python :: 3.8", > > Are these used for any functional purpose, or just really a documentation > thing ? This does introduce the issue of someone having to remember to > add 3.9, 3.10, etc as they arrive. I'm confident we'll forget that. Those are the "Trove clasifiers" <https://pypi.org/classifiers/>, which are for example displayed on PyPi <https://pypi.org/project/libvirt-python/>. It helps to know that someone tested it with those versions. As there is not "does not work with 3.4 or older" I chose to explicitly list the versions which we support currently (contradicting my words above). Philipp