Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] conf, qemu: enable NVDIMM support for ppc64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11. 3. 2020 22:29, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> Using the 'uuid' element for ppc64 NVDIMM memory added in the
> previous patch, use it in qemuBuildMemoryDeviceStr() to pass
> it over to QEMU.
> 
> Another ppc64 restriction is the necessity of a mem->labelsize,
> given than ppc64 only support label-area backed NVDIMMs.
> 
> Finally, we don't want ppc64 NVDIMMs to align up due to the
> high risk of going beyond the end of file with a 256MiB
> increment that the user didn't predict. Align it down
> instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  src/conf/domain_conf.c                        |  7 +++
>  src/qemu/qemu_command.c                       |  7 +++
>  src/qemu/qemu_domain.c                        | 47 +++++++++++++++++--
>  .../memory-hotplug-nvdimm-ppc64.args          | 32 +++++++++++++
>  .../memory-hotplug-nvdimm-ppc64.xml           |  5 +-
>  tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c                      |  4 ++
>  .../memory-hotplug-nvdimm-ppc64.xml           |  5 +-
>  7 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/memory-hotplug-nvdimm-ppc64.args
> 
> diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> index 3ae6c181c2..7f8018fed2 100644
> --- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> +++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
> @@ -16582,6 +16582,13 @@ virDomainMemoryDefParseXML(virDomainXMLOptionPtr xmlopt,
>      if (virDomainMemoryTargetDefParseXML(node, ctxt, def) < 0)
>          goto error;
>  
> +    if (def->model == VIR_DOMAIN_MEMORY_MODEL_NVDIMM &&
> +        ARCH_IS_PPC64(dom->os.arch) && def->labelsize == 0) {
> +        virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR, "%s",
> +                       _("label size is required for NVDIMM device"));
> +        goto error;
> +    }
> +

I think this should go into virDomainMemoryDefValidate() instead,
because this is not strictly a parse error (e.g. like invalid UUID or
missing element).

The rest looks good. Can you please post a v3 of just this patch? I will
handle the review and merge. Sorry for delayed review.

Michal




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux