On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 15:27 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 03:35:03PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > Are we eventually going to have the same syntax-check / build / > > check split as we currently have in Jenkins? > > This isn't a desirable approach, because in general you're not > going to be sharing the git checkout between build jobs in the > pipeline. You can selectively publish data from one stage to > another, but we don't really want to publish the entire build > dir output, which is what would be required to split off the > build & check stages. Makes sense. I was asking mostly out of curiosity anyway. > The main benefit for having them separate is to make it easier > to view the logs to see what part failed. > > GitLab has a mechanism for publishing artifacts, and the GNOME > projects use this to publish their unit tests results in junit > format IIUC. If we can get something like this wired up then we > can solve the problem if making it easy to view test failures > as a distinct thing from general build failures. That'd be neat :) -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
