Re: [PATCH v2 13/19] qemublocktest: Add more tests for block-commit bitmap handling with snapshots

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/11/20 7:55 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
Test handling of more complex cases of merging bitmaps accross

across

snapshots.

Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tests/qemublocktest.c                         |  15 ++
  .../bitmapblockcommit/snapshots-1-2           |  49 +++++++
  .../bitmapblockcommit/snapshots-1-3           |  76 ++++++++++
  .../bitmapblockcommit/snapshots-1-4           | 126 +++++++++++++++++
  .../bitmapblockcommit/snapshots-1-5           | 130 ++++++++++++++++++
  .../bitmapblockcommit/snapshots-2-3           |  49 +++++++
  .../bitmapblockcommit/snapshots-2-4           |  99 +++++++++++++
  .../bitmapblockcommit/snapshots-2-5           | 103 ++++++++++++++
  .../bitmapblockcommit/snapshots-3-4           |  72 ++++++++++
  .../bitmapblockcommit/snapshots-3-5           |  76 ++++++++++
  .../bitmapblockcommit/snapshots-4-4           |  11 ++

Is this merging a snapshot to itself?

  .../bitmapblockcommit/snapshots-4-5           |  33 +++++

Otherwise this looks like you are covering every pair possible.

+++ b/tests/qemublocktest.c
@@ -1291,6 +1291,21 @@ mymain(void)
      TEST_BITMAP_BLOCKCOMMIT("basic-1-3", 1, 3, "basic");
      TEST_BITMAP_BLOCKCOMMIT("basic-2-3", 2, 3, "basic");

+    TEST_BITMAP_BLOCKCOMMIT("snapshots-1-2", 1, 2, "snapshots");
+    TEST_BITMAP_BLOCKCOMMIT("snapshots-1-3", 1, 3, "snapshots");
+    TEST_BITMAP_BLOCKCOMMIT("snapshots-1-4", 1, 4, "snapshots");
+    TEST_BITMAP_BLOCKCOMMIT("snapshots-1-5", 1, 5, "snapshots");
+
+    TEST_BITMAP_BLOCKCOMMIT("snapshots-2-3", 2, 3, "snapshots");
+    TEST_BITMAP_BLOCKCOMMIT("snapshots-2-4", 2, 4, "snapshots");
+    TEST_BITMAP_BLOCKCOMMIT("snapshots-2-5", 2, 5, "snapshots");
+
+    TEST_BITMAP_BLOCKCOMMIT("snapshots-3-4", 3, 4, "snapshots");
+    TEST_BITMAP_BLOCKCOMMIT("snapshots-3-5", 3, 5, "snapshots");
+
+    TEST_BITMAP_BLOCKCOMMIT("snapshots-4-5", 4, 5, "snapshots");

Hmm - you don't even have "snapshots-4-4" as a stem here. Did you add an accidental file?

diff --git a/tests/qemublocktestdata/bitmapblockcommit/snapshots-4-4 b/tests/qemublocktestdata/bitmapblockcommit/snapshots-4-4
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a445fd7c49
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/qemublocktestdata/bitmapblockcommit/snapshots-4-4
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+pre job bitmap disable:
+[
+  {
+    "type": "block-dirty-bitmap-disable",
+    "data": {
+      "node": "libvirt-5-format",
+      "name": "a"
+    }
+  }
+]
+merge bitmpas:
diff --git a/tests/qemublocktestdata/bitmapblockcommit/snapshots-4-5 b/tests/qemublocktestdata/bitmapblockcommit/snapshots-4-5

Otherwise, makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux