On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 18:23:42 +0100, Ján Tomko wrote: > On a Tuesday in 2020, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: [...] > > > While ugly I still think that for greppability/searchability it's way > > > better to keep the object name using camel case. In the end as you've > > > pointed out it's just for the specific methods named above. Making it > > > look ugly is IMO less worse than missing something when trying to > > > understand how the code works. > > > > IIRC, Ján raised the issue of avoiding mixed camelcase/snakecase > > namings originally, so CC'ing to see if he's ok with changing > > back again ? > > I don't care about it enough to send another e-mail after this one :) > > However the case convetion is a part of the macro documentation: > https://developer.gnome.org/gobject/unstable/gobject-Type-Information.html#G-DEFINE-TYPE:CAPS Hmm, sorry I didn't really look into that in the first place so thanks for teaching me. While I don't like yet another convention, I'm okay with the naming in this patch based on the above.
