2010/1/11 <pspreadborough@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> ----- "Matthias Bolte" <matthias.bolte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> 2010/1/10 <pspreadborough@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> >
>> > ----- "Matthias Bolte" <matthias.bolte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >> 2010/1/10 <pspreadborough@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hello,
>> >> >
>> >> > I have been trying to use the domain event C code example but
>> >> > unfortunately it segfaults (signal 11) every time I run it:
>> >> >
>> >> > [root@Spring events-c]# ./event-test
>> >> > myEventAddHandleFunc:221: Add handle 5 1 0xf081a0 0x8f727f8
>> >> > myEventAddHandleFunc:221: Add handle 7 1 0xf09990 0x8f727f8
>> >> > myEventAddHandleFunc:221: Add handle 8 1 0xed7940 0x8f727f8
>> >> > myEventAddTimeoutFunc:251: Adding Timeout -1 0xedefa0 0x8f727f8
>> >> > myEventAddHandleFunc:221: Add handle 11 1 0xed7940 0x8f727f8
>> >> > myEventAddTimeoutFunc:251: Adding Timeout -1 0xedefa0 0x8f727f8
>> >> > main:322 :: Registering domain event cbs
>> >> > Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>> >> >
>> >> > Core was generated by
>> >> >
>> >>
>> `/root/libvirt-0.7.5/examples/domain-events/events-c/.libs/lt-event-test'.
>> >> > Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
>> >> > [New process 21806]
>> >> > [New process 21822]
>> >> > #0 remoteDomainEventQueueFlush (timer=-1, opaque=0x8f727f8) at
>> >> > remote/remote_driver.c:8720
>> >> > 8720 tempQueue.count = priv->domainEvents->count;
>> >> > (gdb) bt
>> >> > #0 remoteDomainEventQueueFlush (timer=-1, opaque=0x8f727f8) at
>> >> > remote/remote_driver.c:8720
>> >> > #1 0x080490d3 in main (argc=Cannot access memory at address 0x1
>> >> > ) at event-test.c:347
>> >> >
>> >> > The stack looks corrupted so I'm doubtful that this trace if of
>> much
>> >> value.
>> >> > I have built
>> >> > and installed libvirt-0.7.5 and it and it's tools seem to be
>> >> operating
>> >> > correctly.
>> >>
>> >> I tried the event-test with libvirt-0.7.5 and QEMU/Xen and both
>> are
>> >> working as expected. No segfaults.
>> >>
>> >> Could you inspect the values of priv and priv->domainEvents in GDB
>> >> using 'p priv' to see if they are NULL and try to dereference them
>> in
>> >> GDB using 'p *priv' to see if they point to valid memory areas?
>> >>
>> >> Yes the backtrace looks corrupted. If there is stack/heap
>> corruption
>> >> involved valgrind may reveal it, so try to run the event-test in
>> >> valgrind and see if that gives any hints.
>> >>
>> >> You can also try the GIT version of libvirt. There was a invalid
>> free
>> >> call (resulting in heap corruption) in the node device code fixed
>> >> after the 0.7.5 release. But that should have no effect on the
>> >> event-test.
>> >>
>> >> Matthias
>> >
>> > Matthias,
>> >
>> > priv->domainEvents is NULL, here's the gdb output:
>>
>> This explains the segfault. The next question is, why is it NULL?
>>
>> > (gdb) p *priv
>> > $1 = {lock = {lock = {__data = {__lock = 1, __count = 0, __owner =
>> 21806, __kind = 0, __nusers = 1, {__spins = 0, __list = {
>> > __next = 0x0}}}, __size =
>> "\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000.U\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000",
>> > __align = 1}}, sock = 150469168, watch = 3, pid = 4, uses_tls =
>> 1982791681, is_secure = 1815048801, session = 0x782f6269,
>>
>> Seeing uses_tls and is_secure being large numbers and knowing that
>> both are used as boolean values in the code and should have values of
>> 0 or 1 make me think that priv points to already freed memory here.
>>
>> > type = 0x2f646e65 <Address 0x2f646e65 out of bounds>, counter =
>> 1684956536, localUses = 1668248365,
>> > hostname = 0x74656b <Address 0x74656b out of bounds>, debugLog =
>> 0x0, saslconn = 0x0, saslDecoded = 0x0, saslDecodedLength = 0,
>>
>> type and hostname are char pointers, but the seem to point into
>> nowhere, confirms that this is either freed memory or priv itself got
>> overwritten due to heap corruption.
>>
>> > saslDecodedOffset = 0, saslEncoded = 0x0, saslEncodedLength = 0,
>> saslEncodedOffset = 0,
>> > buffer = '\0' <repeats 68 times>,
>> "n\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\bQ�\b����\030\034�\b\000\000\000\000�\033�\b\001\000\000\000\002\000\000\000�\033�\b\000\000\000\000\025|�\000\a",
>> '\0' <repeats 11 times>, "X\000�\b", '\0' <repeats 12 times>,
>> "\021\000\000\000\002\000\000\000P��\b\000\000\000\000\021", '\0'
>> <repeats 15 times>,
>> "\021\000\000\0008\036�\b\f\000\000\000\020\000\000\000\021\000\000\000\a\000\000\000\b\000\000\000\t\000\000\000\021\000\000\000\002\000\000\000\230\034�\b\000\000\000\000A\000\000\000\003\000\000\000\001\000\000\000\001\000"...,
>> bufferLength = 0,
>> > bufferOffset = 0, callbackList = 0x0, domainEvents = 0x0,
>> eventFlushTimer = 0, domainEventDispatching = 1, wakeupSendFD = 0,
>> > wakeupReadFD = 0, waitDispatch = 0x0, streams = 0x0}
>> >
>> > I'll try a run with valgrind and post the results.
>> >
>> > Pete
>> >
>>
>> Could you test the Python version of this example found in
>> examples/domain-events/events-python/event-test.py? Does this work?
>>
>> Otherwise lets see if valgrind gives any hints.
>>
>> Matthias
>
>
> During initialization I notice that the myEventAddHandleFunc() method is
> called multiple times, each time with a different fd value (5,7,8 and 11).
> The way the code is written only the last fd value is recorded and then
> used in the poll() call. Is this the intended? if so why are the preceding
> fds ignored?
>
> myEventAddHandleFunc:223: Add handle 5 1 0xf13480 0x97b97d8
> myEventAddHandleFunc:223: Add handle 7 1 0xf14c70 0x97b97d8
> Allocating domainEvents:0x97c6b10
> myEventAddHandleFunc:223: Add handle 8 1 0xee2940 0x97b97d8
> myEventAddTimeoutFunc:260: Adding Timeout -1 0xee9fc0 0x97b97d8
> Allocating domainEvents:0x97c5780
> myEventAddHandleFunc:223: Add handle 11 1 0xee2940 0x97b97d8
> myEventAddTimeoutFunc:260: Adding Timeout -1 0xee9fc0 0x97b97d8
> main:333 :: Registering domain event cbs
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Pete
>
That's strange. I can't reproduce this neither. I always get exactly
one call to myEventAddHandleFunc:
myEventAddHandleFunc:221: Add handle 3 1 0x7ff116f68b00 0x1d97f00
myEventAddTimeoutFunc:251: Adding Timeout -1 0x7ff116f68750 0x1d97f00
main:322 :: Registering domain event cbs
myEventUpdateHandleFunc:232: Updated Handle 0 0
myEventUpdateHandleFunc:232: Updated Handle 0 1
You could try to run the event-test in GDB and set a breakpoint on
myEventAddHandleFunc to see where 4 additional calls to
myEventAddHandleFunc come from.
In my case I get this backtrace when setting a breakpoint on
myEventAddHandleFunc:
(gdb) bt
#0 myEventAddHandleFunc (fd=6, event=1, cb=0x7f1be6ec3b00
<remoteDomainEventFired>, opaque=0xc68f00, ff=0) at event-test.c:220
#1 0x00007f1be6ecbaaf in doRemoteOpen (conn=0xc68f00,
priv=0x7f1be7350010, auth=0x0, flags=0) at remote/remote_driver.c:893
#2 0x00007f1be6ece053 in remoteOpen (conn=0xc68f00, auth=0x0,
flags=13007744) at remote/remote_driver.c:1076
#3 0x00007f1be6eb155d in do_open (name=0x7fff48400968
"qemu:///system", auth=0x0, flags=0) at libvirt.c:1117
#4 0x0000000000400eb3 in main (argc=<value optimized out>,
argv=<value optimized out>) at event-test.c:313
Matthias
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list