On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 22:10:42 +0800, Yi Wang wrote: > From: Huang Zijiang <huang.zijiang@xxxxxxxxxx> > > virJSONValueObjectGetObject maybe return NULL if the key is > missing or if value is not the correct TYPE, so we have to prevent > a NULl pointer from being accessed. > > Signed-off-by: Huang Zijiang <huang.zijiang@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/util/virqemu.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/util/virqemu.c b/src/util/virqemu.c > index f3a233a..29fbe4e 100644 > --- a/src/util/virqemu.c > +++ b/src/util/virqemu.c > @@ -257,6 +257,11 @@ virQEMUBuildObjectCommandlineFromJSON(virBufferPtr buf, > const char *type = virJSONValueObjectGetString(objprops, "qom-type"); > const char *alias = virJSONValueObjectGetString(objprops, "id"); > virJSONValuePtr props = virJSONValueObjectGetObject(objprops, "props"); > + if (!props) { > + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, "%s", > + _("reply was missing return props data")); This error message is misleading. There's no reply, but rather this is an internally generated JSON struct > + return -1; > + } > > return virQEMUBuildObjectCommandlineFromJSONInternal(buf, type, alias, props); This function checks 'props' internally. What is this patch supposed to fix?