On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 04:33:50PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 1/31/20 3:43 PM, Ján Tomko wrote:The rewrite to use GLib's atomic ops functions changed the behavior of virAtomicIntInc - before it returned the pre-increment value. Most of the callers using its value were adjusted, but the one in qemuDriverAllocateID was not. If libvirtd would reconnect to a running domain during startup, the next started domain would get the same ID: $ virsh list Id Name State -------------------------- 1 f28live running 1 f28live1 running Use the g_atomic_add function directly (as recommended in viratomic.h) and add 1 to the result. This also restores the usual numbering from 1 instead of 0. Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@xxxxxxxxxx> Fixes: 7b9645a7d127a374b8d1c83fdf9789706dbab2c9 --- src/qemu/qemu_conf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_conf.c b/src/qemu/qemu_conf.c index e5051027fc..0b119cbe78 100644 --- a/src/qemu/qemu_conf.c +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_conf.c @@ -1858,7 +1858,7 @@ qemuSetUnprivSGIO(virDomainDeviceDefPtr dev) int qemuDriverAllocateID(virQEMUDriverPtr driver) { - return virAtomicIntInc(&driver->lastvmid); + return g_atomic_int_add(&driver->lastvmid, 1) + 1; }Does it makes sense to replace all virAtomic with g_atomic or do we
That does make sense. It is encouraged in viratomic.h, as I said in the commit message. The reason I did not cleanup all of them is the bugfix nature of this patch.
still pretend that we care about client library and we don't crash on OOM in it?
I sincerely hope that none of the g_atomic functions allocate memory. Jano
Michal
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
