On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:49:28PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 11:35 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:29:19PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > > > The package is no longer built on the architecture: this only affects > > > sid at the moment, but it's unlikely that it will be re-introduced so > > > just assume that won't happen and structure the mapping accordingly. > > > > IIRC, rbd upstream dropped support for any 32-bit architecture, so > > I wouldn't be surprised if this disappears from other arches too. > > We'll cross that bridge when we get to it. As of today, > > https://packages.debian.org/sid/librbd-dev > > shows that quite a few 32-bit architectures are still supported, at > least as far as Debian is concerned. Looking again at Fedora it seems upstream dropped support long ago but Fedora kept building until we hit a problem with compilers running out of address space. If Debian is cross compiling from a 64bit machine they'd avoid this. So anyway Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list