On 08/01/20 10:58, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> the kernel-side patch certainly makes sense. I assume that you want the >> event to propagate up from QEMU to Libvirt and so on? The QEMU patch >> would need to declare a new event (qapi/misc.json) and send it in >> handle_event (hw/misc/pvpanic.c). For Libvirt I'm not familiar, so I'm >> adding the respective list. > > Adding an event is fairly easy, if everything you want libvirt to do is > report the event to upper layers. I volunteer to do it. Question is, how > qemu is going to report this, whether some attributes to GUEST_PANICKED > event or some new event. I think it should be a new event, using GUEST_PANICKED could cause upper layers to react by shutting down or rebooting the guest. Thanks, Paolo -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
