Re: [jenkins-ci PATCH 1/5] guests: Add mapping for augeas-lenses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/12/19 9:19 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 15:57 +0000, Jim Fehlig wrote:
>> On 12/12/19 8:07 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 15:43 +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 3:31 PM Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> +  augeas-lenses:
>>>>> +    default: augeas
>>>>> +    deb: augeas-lenses
>>>>> +    OpenSUSE: augeas-lenses
>>>>
>>>> Hmm. I guess it only hits the container, am I right? Because in the VM
>>>> it's installed as part of the base system.
>>>
>>> It looks like it's needed by yast:
>>>
>>>     $ sudo zypper remove augeas-lenses
>>>     Loading repository data...
>>>     Warning: No repositories defined. Operating only with the installed resolvables. Nothing can be installed.
>>>     Reading installed packages...
>>>     Resolving package dependencies...
>>>
>>>     The following 15 packages are going to be REMOVED:
>>>       augeas-lenses patterns-yast-yast2_basis yast2-bootloader yast2-country
>>>       yast2-installation yast2-ldap yast2-mail yast2-network yast2-online-update
>>>       yast2-online-update-frontend yast2-packager yast2-storage-ng yast2-tune
>>>       yast2-update yast2-users
>>>
>>>     The following pattern is going to be REMOVED:
>>>       yast2_basis
>>>
>>>     15 packages to remove.
>>>     After the operation, 7.5 MiB will be freed.
>>>     Continue? [y/n/v/...? shows all options] (y):
>>>
>>> The container is minimal, and doesn't include yast at all:
>>>
>>>     $ rpm -qa | grep yast
>>>     $
>>>
>>> So that would explain the difference.
>>
>> If the difference is unwanted we could remove the yast2_basis pattern from
>> autoinst.xml.
> 
> What would we lose by doing so? In general we install only the very
> basics through the OS' native installer and then add everything we
> need on top using lcitool, so it certainly sounds like it could make
> sense to drop it...

It's an installation and config management tool. Obviously we don't need it for 
installation, and I don't think we'll be using it for management within the VM. 
I can try removing it and send a patch if there are no ill effects, but it will 
have to wait until next week when I have some free time.

Regards,
Jim

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux