On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:00:42AM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 9:54 AM Andrea Bolognani <abologna@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > We're currently waiting to see whether we can get more capacity > > for our CI environment, and in the meantime we've decided not do > > create additional builders on the existing machine. > > > > In order to be able to deploy other configuration changes without > > enabling CentOS 8 jobs at the same time, we need to temporarily > > drop all mentions of the target from the Jenkins configuration: > > once we've figured out where to create the CentOS 8 builder, we > > can simply revert this patch. > > At this point I'd rather disable CentOS 7 builds than not enable CentOS 8. Definitely not. CentOS 7 builder CI is one of the most successful targets at finding bugs. CentOS 8 is very similar to other modern distros we're testing, so it doesn't add significant coverage. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
