Re: [PATCH] doc: vtpm only support secrets by UUID at this point

[Cole Robinson <crobinso@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 12/10/19 10:08 AM, marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Support by usage name can be considered separately (with a 'usage'
> attribute?).
> 
> Cc: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  docs/formatsecret.html.in | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/docs/formatsecret.html.in b/docs/formatsecret.html.in
> index 8d0630a7c3..8f5383cf64 100644
> --- a/docs/formatsecret.html.in
> +++ b/docs/formatsecret.html.in
> @@ -334,8 +334,8 @@ Secret value set
>        of the vTPM.
>        The <code>&lt;usage type='vtpm'&gt;</code> element must contain
>        a single <code>name</code> element that specifies a usage name
> -      for the secret.  The vTPM secret can then be used by UUID or by
> -      this usage name via the <code>&lt;encryption&gt;</code> element of
> +      for the secret.  The vTPM secret can then be used by UUID
> +      via the <code>&lt;encryption&gt;</code> element of
>        a <a href="formatdomain.html#elementsTpm">tpm</a> when using an
>        emulator.
>        <span class="since">Since 5.6.0</span>. The following is an example
> 

I've pushed this now

- Cole

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list